Bronze VS Brass

In international hardware manufacturing, the choice of materials has a direct impact on product performance, production efficiency, and overall cost. Among copper alloys, bronze and brass are especially important, widely used in mechanical parts, bathroom fittings, decorative elements, and industrial equipment.

Data from the International Copper Association shows that brass represents about 58% of global copper alloy consumption, while bronze accounts for roughly 32%. Although the two materials are often grouped together, their differences in composition, properties, and applications are substantial. These variations shape how they are processed, how long they last, and where they are best applied.

The following sections take a closer look at how bronze and brass compare, from their basic composition to their performance and cost in real-world applications.

1. What is Brass?

Brass is an alloy of copper and zinc, with zinc content typically ranging from 5–45%. It has been used since the 1st century BC, and thanks to advancements in metallurgy, brass has become one of the most widely applied copper alloys today.

Main composition: Copper (Cu) 50–95%, Zinc (Zn) 5–50%
Common types of brass include:

• Plain brass (Cu-Zn alloys): e.g., H62 (62% copper, 38% zinc), known for good plasticity and corrosion resistance.
• Lead brass: e.g., HPb59-1, with added lead for improved machinability, ideal for precision parts.
• Tin brass: e.g., HSn70-1, with added tin for seawater corrosion resistance, widely used in marine fittings.
• Aluminum brass: e.g., HA177-2, with added aluminum for enhanced strength and wear resistance.

Common International Grades

2. Mechanical Properties of Brass

When comparing different grades, it is useful to look at their mechanical properties side by side. The tables below summarize the performance of common plain and special brasses:

Mechanical Properties of Plain Brass

Mechanical Properties of Special Brass

3. What is Bronze?

Bronze originally referred to copper–tin alloys, but in modern industry it generally means copper alloys without zinc (or with very little zinc), combined with elements such as tin, aluminum, silicon, or nickel.

Common types of bronze include:

• Tin bronze (Cu-Sn): e.g., QSn6.5-0.1, excellent wear resistance, used in bearings and gears.
• Aluminum bronze (Cu-Al): e.g., QAl9-4, high strength and corrosion resistance, used in chemical valves.
• Silicon bronze (Cu-Si): e.g., QSi3-1, good conductivity, used in electrical components.
• Beryllium bronze (Cu-Be): e.g., QBe2, very high strength and elasticity, used in precision instruments and springs.

Common International Grades

4. Mechanical Properties of Common Bronze Types

Below is a comparison of common bronze types and their typical performance metrics:

5. Processing Methods and Applications: Bronze vs Brass

While both alloys share some manufacturing techniques, their differences in ductility, hardness, and corrosion resistance influence optimal methods.

Bronze Processing

Bronze alloys, depending on their type, require tailored processing approaches:

1. Casting: Techniques such as sand casting, investment casting, and permanent mold casting are widely used, particularly for tin and leaded bronzes. These methods allow complex shapes and good surface finishes for bearings, bushings, and decorative components.
2. Forming: Aluminum and beryllium bronzes can be forged, rolled, or stamped into sheets, rods, and precision components. This process enhances mechanical strength and structural integrity.
3. Heat Treatment: Beryllium bronze can achieve tensile strengths exceeding 1,200 MPa after aging, making it ideal for high-stress applications such as springs and aerospace parts.
4. CNC Machining: Leaded bronze and some silicon bronzes exhibit excellent machinability, making them suitable for components like valves, bearings, and bushings that demand tight tolerances.

Brass Processing

Brass’s high ductility and corrosion resistance allow versatile manufacturing options:

1. Forming (Core Method): Rolling, drawing, stamping, and extrusion are extensively used, producing sheets, rods, and tubes with consistent dimensions and smooth surfaces.
2. Casting: Large or geometrically complex components can be cast effectively, often using leaded brass for improved machinability.
3. Welding and Brazing: Brass components can be joined reliably, enabling fabrication of pipes, heat exchangers, and assemblies.
4. Surface Treatment: Techniques such as electroplating, passivation, and coloring enhance both corrosion resistance and aesthetic appeal, extending service life in decorative and functional applications.
5. CNC Machining: Leaded brass grades such as HPb59-1 are widely employed for precision plumbing fittings, mechanical parts, and fasteners, where dimensional accuracy is critical.

6. Cost Considerations: Bronze vs Brass

Material selection is not only about performance and durability—it also has a direct impact on production costs and overall project budgets.

• Raw Materials: Tin, a primary component of many bronze alloys, is relatively expensive (≈$25,000/ton in 2025), making bronze roughly 40–60% more costly than brass, which primarily uses zinc (≈$2,800/ton). This price gap is a major factor in alloy selection for large-volume production.
• Processing Costs: Bronze parts, especially those produced via sand casting, tend to be more labor-intensive and costly, averaging around 160 RMB/kg, compared to 55 RMB/kg for brass parts produced through die casting. Differences in machinability and required finishing also contribute to cost variations.
• Logistics & Tariffs: Import regulations further affect costs. For instance, the EU imposes 3% tariffs on bronze and 5% on brass, while the U.S. enforces anti-dumping duties on high-lead brass but not on bronze, impacting international sourcing decisions.
• Certification: Compliance with standards such as REACH (EU) or UL (USA) adds another layer of cost, particularly for components used in regulated industries like electronics, plumbing, or aerospace.

Cost optimization strategies include substituting brass for non-critical parts, using recycled alloys, or leveraging regional manufacturing to reduce labor costs.

7. Standards and Compliance

Beyond performance and cost, material selection for bronze and brass must also consider industry standards and regulatory compliance.

Mechanical Standards: Brass and bronze must conform to recognized standards such as ASTM B140 (brass), EN 1982 (bronze), and ISO 4287 for surface roughness, ensuring consistent material properties and machining quality.

Environmental Regulations: Compliance with environmental directives is essential. For example, the EU’s RoHS restricts lead content to ≤0.1%, although certain brass alloys are exempt up to 4%, allowing a balance between machinability and environmental safety.

Industry-Specific Requirements: Different sectors impose specific rules. Bronze components for shipbuilding must meet DNV GL standards; brass parts for drinking water systems require NSF/ANSI 61 certification; aerospace-grade beryllium bronze must comply with AMS 4535 for high-strength applications.

Labeling and Documentation: Accurate marking of alloy composition, mechanical properties, and certifications is mandatory under CE (EU), FCC (US), and JIS (Japan) regulations, facilitating traceability and quality assurance.

Conclusion

Bronze and brass each bring something different to the table: bronze offers strength, wear resistance, and reliability under high loads, while brass is easier to machine, more ductile, and generally more cost-effective. The choice isn’t about which is “better,” but which suits the specific demands of your project.

If you’re ready to move from design to production, consulting an expert like the Beska team experienced in custom bronze and brass manufacturing solutions can make all the difference.

Deeper into Our Resources

For some insightful reads, we’ve curated a list of recommended articles just for you:

• How to Polish Bronze
• How to Cut Bronze
• CNC Machining Bronze
• Sheet Metal Forming 
• Surface Finishing

FAQ